Seattle Karma Rotating Header Image

Acupuncture doesn’t work, although it may help…

acupuncture-beautyWait, what?  How can something that doesn’t work, help?  And if it helps, doesn’t that mean it works?

There is a new study out today (Reuters, Seattle PI) from the Group Health Center for Health Studies that shows acupuncture provides at least some benefit to people with chronic lower back pain.  I’m sure that acupuncture devotees will latch onto this study as meaningful proof that acupuncture works, but they should pause before popping the champagne cork:  the study also demonstrated that it didn’t matter if you used needles or toothpicks, or whether you penetrated or didn’t penetrate the skin.  Although this study didn’t run a test group that received acupuncture using non-acupuncture points (it would have been more thorough if it had, and I wonder why it did not), the results match other studies that have done exactly that, so it’s safe to say that acupuncture works whether you’re receiving “real” acupuncture or not.  The mere act of poking someone in the back with something sharp (maybe not even that; other studies have shown that fingertips will do) and telling them they were being treated with acupuncture was good enough to realize the same amount of benefit across the board.  The conclusion of the study was this:

Although acupuncture was found effective for chronic low back pain, tailoring needling sites to each patient and penetration of the skin appear to be unimportant in eliciting therapeutic benefits. These findings raise questions about acupuncture’s purported mechanisms of action. It remains unclear whether acupuncture or our simulated method of acupuncture provide physiologically important stimulation or represent placebo or nonspecific effects.

As the conclusion suggests, what we’re probably seeing here is the famed placebo effect at work – if someone genuinely believes that a sham treatment will work, sometimes it does.  Whatever the real reason, the study makes it clear that the mechanism of action – why does acupuncture work? – remains a mystery.  Traditional Chinese medicine claims that acupuncture releases qi energy, but such energy has never actually been observed and is not scientifically recognized.

So, even if acupuncture is chiefly a matter of belief, what’s the harm if it provides relief?  It may be fair to say that, for some, acupuncture helps.  But it most likely doesn’t “work”, meaning that there is no mechanism by which acupuncture itself treats anything.  The suggestion that it will treat something and the strong beliefs of many of its patients probably contributes greatly to its anecdotal success, but it is important to note that the placebo effect is not a miracle worker.  It won’t make a tumor go away just because a patient believes it will.  And this is where the danger lies – people tend to attribute far too much power to the placebo effect, thinking that it doesn’t matter if the treatment works or not as long as it helps.  If you merely feel pain, yes, a placebo treatment may help, probably because a great deal of pain is in the mind and a matter of perspective and attitude.  But if you have a condition such as cancer or a viral infection or what have you, the placebo effect isn’t going to do anything.  Tumors don’t have beliefs and are not affected by placebos.

The whole study can be found here. It’s pretty accessible to the layman and well worth a read, especially the discussion at the end.

Worrying about swine flu? Don’t…

It’s being reported (Seattle Times, Seattle PI) that the H1N1 “swine flu” influenza virus has taken the life of a man in Snohomish County, the third death in the US from the virus.  He was in his 30s and had an underlying heart condition.  Apparently, there are 101 confirmed cases of H1N1 in the state of Washington, with about 75% of them striking children under 19 years of age.  There are several more cases considered “probable”.

I know a lot of people are concerned about this, but a little perspective is in order:  the “swine flu” is not particularly different from any other strain of flu.  They all operate the same way:  influenza is an infectious disease caused by a family of viruses that affect birds and mammals.  All flus have the same common symptoms:  chills, fever, sore throat, muscle pains, headaches, coughing, weakness and general discomfort.  All flus can cause pneumonia, which is what this man ultimately died of.  All flus in the United States cause about 36,000 deaths per year. Most of us recover from the flu just fine, which is why everyone thinks it’s no big deal, and most people I know don’t even think that it kills anyone (so when they hear the media reporting on swine flu deaths, they freak out, thinking it’s a “different” kind of flu).  But it does, all the time, usually the very young and the very old, who tend to have compromised immune systems.  Many more deaths occur in people who already have pre-existing health conditions.

Some people are concerned that it was not reported exactly who this man is, where he lives or what community he hails from.  But it doesn’t matter where he lives – flus spread easily over the air and with so many cases in the state at any given time, there is no way to avoid the flu by staying away from certain areas or communities.  It is everywhere already.  The flu is not something that is practical to try and contain; there are thousands of active cases at all times of the year.  If you want to try and avoid the flu (and you should), you do the usual things you do to avoid all sickness:  wash your hands, cover your face when you cough or sneeze, avoid others who are coughing or sneezing, and for crying out loud, if you’re sick or your children are sick, stay home from work and keep the kids out of school!  Nothing drives me more crazy than selfish oafs who feel they have to show up to work or ship their kids off to school with snot running down their swollen faces – think of others and keep your flu to yourself.

It’s important to note that the swine flu is just that – another flu.  It’s no different or especially dangerous compared to other flu viruses.  It is not something you want to get, just like you don’t want to get any kind of flu, but I am not sure why the media is making such a big deal out of this particular flu.  New strains pop up all the time.  Around the world, flu spreads every year in seasonal epidemics and kills hundreds of thousands – a big deal, to be sure, but it’s no bigger with the swine flu than any other.  I guess particular attention is being paid to the swine flu because it’s new, but I know people who are especially worried about this particular flu, when in reality it presents no more danger than any other flu.

So, if you’re worried about the swine flu, you should be worried about all flu, and if you’re going to worry about all flu, well, that’s a pretty good way to needlessly make yourself paranoid and miserable for no good reason.  “Worry is like interest paid on a debt that never comes due.”  Pretty much all of us will get the flu several times in our lives, and it’s just part of being a living biological animal on this planet.  Most of us will not die from it – our bodies are pretty good at fighting this sort of thing off.  This is not to say the flu need not be taken seriously.  If you get sick, you should definitely take good care of yourself with lots of rest and liquids, and if you’re feeling especially bad you should see your doctor and follow his advice to the letter.  The flu does kill and should be taken seriously.  But you need not worry about it excessively, no more than you’d worry about being involved in a fatal automobile accident or suffering a heart attack or any other of the hundreds of myriad events that could claim your life each and every day.  If you worry about those things all the time, see a therapist.  ;-)

More information on the swine flu at Wikipedia, King County Public Health Department, Seattle Local Health Guide, and the World Health Organization.

Shine on, crazy diamond…

Some asshat (or multiple asshats) is shining lasers at planes landing at Sea Tac airport.  There have been at least half a dozen incidents of lasers shined at some 20-odd planes since February 2009, and while I don’t know for sure how dangerous that actually is, it is not cool regardless.  Not cool.  These are aircraft, and if anything were to go wrong and the plane were to crash, however remote that possibility, hundreds of people would surely die.  You just don’t mess around with things like that, no matter what.  Period.

And yet we keep seeing these stories in the local news.  Police took a man into custody last month, but released him without charging him.  I don’t know what that’s all about, but how hard can it really be to find someone shining lasers at planes?  The planes even have surveillance footage of some of the shinings – the Seattle Times published one of these videos last month, and you could clearly see the backyard the laser was coming from.

One commenter in the Times story speculates that it could be someone angry with the controversial third runway that was installed at Sea Tac.  Well, that may be, but then they should bring it up with the appropriate venue, move somewhere else, or simply get over it.  One thing is for sure, the people flying on that plane have nothing to do with the price of tea in China, and don’t deserve to be endangered by this kind of juvenile behavior.

To the the person(s) doing this:  knock it off.  It’s not funny, and no one thinks you’re clever.  When you get caught – and you will get caught – everyone will think you’re nothing but a loser.  So beat it and go find something else to waste your time on.  Preferably something that doesn’t endanger other peoples’ lives.

Meat is made out of meat, go figure…

Normally I love Gizmodo, but today they got a little sensationalist with this headline:  A Tour of McDonald’s Horrifying Mechanized Meat Factories.  Having read that, I expected to see some kind of undercover, covert video or pictures of some disgusting practice the popular fast-food chain conducts away from prying eyes, something likely to turn off even the most devoted fast-food devouring consumer.  Maybe McDonald’s throws entire live cows right into the grinding machine in the back room of every restaurant and makes strawberry milkshakes with the blood.  Morbidly fascinating, right?

Instead, they link to…a McDonald’s-produced public relations piece made to reassure consumers of the safety and quality of their meat.  Big surprise:  the video does exactly what it intends to do, and reassures consumers of the safety and quality of their meat!  Yes, it brings you inside a meat processing factory, but I fail to see what’s so “horrifying” about that.  I mean, did they think hamburgers grew on trees?  Maybe they were delivered by unicorns sliding down rainbows?  Shocker:  did you know we get hamburger from cows?  Meat is made of meat – someone alert the presses!

There is nary a “horrifying” scene in this video, unless you’re a member of PETA, which I think it’s safe to say, most of us are not.  And even if you’re a dedicated vegan and wouldn’t touch meat with a ten-foot pole, you’d hardly be surprised or especially disgusted by what’s in this video.  It’s not like one of those slaughterhouse videos that actually has a good chance of turning you off meat for quite a while, it’s just a McDonald’s factory where – again, big surprise! – they handle their meat safely and carefully.  It’s inspected multiple times and runs through a metal detector at the end of the line.  Gizmodo makes a big deal of that last part.  Guess what?  Virtually all food factories run their food through metal detectors, because all that food is run through machines that are – wait for it – made out of metal, and it only takes one slip-up to bring on a monster lawsuit.  These kinds of checks and balances are reassuring, not reason to be alarmed.

It’s rare to see a website as big as Gizmodo post something so naive.  Try again, guys – next thing you’ll be telling us they make bread from plants, and that cheese is actually mold!  Oh noes!

Mayor Nickels likes to burn Seattle’s money…

At least, I think he does.  I think this, because he apparently likes to pursue agendas that result in inevitable legal cases against the city that the city doesn’t stand one chance of winning.  From the Seattle Times comes this gem:

After a shooting at last year’s Northwest Folklife Festival left three people injured, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels vowed to outlaw guns in city buildings, parks and Seattle Center.

The proposal has languished for almost a year, with the state Attorney General’s Office saying the mayor lacks the authority to prohibit guns on city property, a Second Amendment group threatening to sue and questions continuing as to what the policy would really accomplish.

Well, yeah.  I mean, that’s pretty cut and dried, isn’t it?  Look, I’m no fan of guns myself.  I don’t support the NRA, who I think is overzealous in their protection of the Second Amendment, which itself seems a little fuzzy in this day and age (really, did our forefathers foresee the existence of something like assault rifles?  Should that matter?  I think it should).  I’m fully in favor of regulating guns, and making those who want to own and fire them obtain registrations and licenses.  I think guns should be carefully tracked and watched over.  I don’t even own a gun – in fact, amazingly enough, I’ve never even fired one.  Not once.  So, clearly my bias is not with gun owners.

But even I recognize a sure loser when I see one.  Again, from the Seattle Times article linked above:

With another Northwest Folklife approaching on Memorial Day weekend, a spokesman for Nickels said the mayor is moving ahead with an executive order this spring and is prepared to defend it in court.

Even if the order is not in place, the May 22-25 festival will be gun-free through the city’s lease with festival organizers. Signs posted at the Seattle Center event will remind people not to bring guns, and security will be trained to take firearms away or ask people to leave, says Alex Fryer, a Nickels spokesman.

The new city order would apply even to people who have a state permit allowing them to carry a concealed weapon. Without a permit, it’s already illegal in Washington to carry a concealed weapon in public.

…Washington state law says cities can’t restrict firearms beyond state law.

Seattle mayor Greg Nickels

Seattle mayor Greg Nickels

So, let me make sure I have this straight.  The mayor of Seattle wants to circumvent the Second Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights as well as State law, even though the State Attorney General has told him it won’t fly, an activist group waits with a lawsuit in hand ready to deliver the moment the order is given, and the State of Washington itself has a law on the books prohibiting cities from restricting firearms beyond state law, but the mayor wants to go through with this anyway?  He cites a State Supreme Court ruling from 2006 that involved an event in the small Washington town of Sequim as setting a precedent for this, but that seems to have involved (and I’m no lawyer, so someone correct me if I misread this) an event in the context of a private party, the same as if I told you not to bring your gun into my house (which I’m perfectly entitled to do), not a public event open to everyone.  Even then, the decision seems a bit wishy-washy and not in the slightest bit airtight.  And this is what Mayor Nickels wants to potentially bet millions of dollars on?

Ultimately, it doesn’t seem to me that Mayor Nickels has the authority to enact such an order.  It’s blatantly unconstitutional, and the State Attorney General, who is probably a bit more of an expert on State law than Mayor Nickels is, has told him flat-out that it won’t hold water.  Whenever I hear about cases like this, I think of Kitzmiller v Dover, and how people with an agenda can move recklessly, thoughtlessly forward on a virtual suicide mission just because of their strong beliefs, not realizing all the while that judges don’t much consider beliefs – they tend to consider law.  I’m not saying I agree or disagree with what Mayor Nickels wants to do, I’m just saying that it’s throwing good money down the toilet, because it doesn’t seem to me there’s any way to win a case like this.  You don’t bring a loser to the championship fight, and that’s exactly what Mayor Nickels is doing.  Unfortunately, it’s not his pocket in particular that’s affected – it’s the pockets of his constituents, whom he’s doing a great disservice.  It wouldn’t be the first time.

Save 35% Off Great Movies!       Shop Tinderbox.com for Premium Cigars!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner